16.7 C
London
Saturday, September 24, 2022

Researchers train AI to predict EV battery degradation

Must read

Texas police investigate use of force after video circulates of a cop hitting a student against a lunch cart

Police in Irving, Texas, are investigating a cop's use of force after a video showing the cop throwing a student into a lunch cart...

Netflix Edition of Night School’s ‘Oxenfree’ Now Available to Play on iOS and Android • londonbusinessblog.com

Netflix is ​​adding Oxenfree, the popular supernatural mystery thriller game created by Night School Studio, to its game offering. Oxenfree: Netflix Edition is...

How Change Co-Founders Brainstormed About Entrepreneurship • londonbusinessblog.com

Welcome back to Found, the podcast where we get the stories behind the startups. After graduation, co-founders Amar Shah and Sonia Nigam were bored with...
Shreya Christinahttps://londonbusinessblog.com
Shreya has been with londonbusinessblog.com for 3 years, writing copy for client websites, blog posts, EDMs and other mediums to engage readers and encourage action. By collaborating with clients, our SEO manager and the wider londonbusinessblog.com team, Shreya seeks to understand an audience before creating memorable, persuasive copy.

Lithium-ion batteries have become an important part of the rise of electric mobility, but predicting their health and lifespan limits the technology.

While they have proved successful, lithium-ion batteries’ capacity decreases over time, and not just because of the aging process that occurs during charging and discharging – known as ‘cyclic aging’.

Batteries also deteriorate when not in use

Lithium-ion battery cells also suffer from degradation from so-called “calendar aging”, which occurs during storage or simply when the battery is not in use. It is determined by three main factors: the resting state of the charge (SOC), the resting temperature and the duration of a battery’s rest time.

Hi there, EV nerd!

Sign up now for a weekly summary of our favorite mobility stories

Since an electric vehicle will be parked for most of its life, it is crucial to predict the capacity reduction of the cells due to calendar aging; it can extend battery life and pave the way for mechanisms that could even circumvent the phenomenon.

For this reason, researchers have used advanced machine learning algorithms to accurately predict calendar aging.

Bridging research with the EV market

In a recent study funded by the EU Horizon 2020 programa team of scientists took the research one step further by comparing the accuracy of two algorithms across the broad spectrum of commercial lithium-ion battery chemistry.

Specifically, they pulled calendar aging data from six types of battery cell chemistry: lithium cobalt oxide (LCO), lithium iron phosphate (LIP), lithium manganese oxide (LMO), lithium titanium oxide (LTO), nickel cobalt alumina. (NCA), and nickel manganese cobalt oxide (NMC).

These battery cells were calendar-aged in temperature chambers at 50, 60 and 70 degrees Celsius, using high, medium and low voltages.

To predict aging, the team examined the efficiency of two machine learning algorithms: Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and an Artificial Neural Network (ANN).

How do the algorithms work?

Both algorithms were chosen for their ability to provide reliable results, but they differ significantly in their operation.

XGBoost is a decision tree-based, state-of-the-art machine learning supervision algorithm widely used in regression or classification problems.

The Ann is an artificial adaptive system that uses its basic elements called neurons and connections to convert its global input into a predicted output.

To evaluate their performance, the researchers used mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), which measures the average size of errors between predicted and measured values. Simply put, the smaller the MAPE value, the higher the prediction accuracy.

What did the results show?

The training of the algorithms showed that XGBoost can be used to effectively predict the calendar aging of most chemicals with a significant minimum mean absolute error. Meanwhile, ANN produces satisfactory results for LFP, LTO and NCA cell chemistry only.

You can see their accuracy in the chart below:

Machine Learning EV Battery Degradation