10.6 C
Tuesday, March 21, 2023

Why women in the US need to hide their digital footprint now

Must read

Madison Cheatow – Age, Height, Boyfriend, Net Worth, Wiki

• Madison Cheatow is a Canadian actress and director • She is best known for her roles as Ruby Skye in the movie franchise...

Super-sized trapdoor spider discovered in Australia

Researchers in Australia have made a big discovery: a super-sized species of trapdoor spider found only in Central Queensland.The arachnid is called Euoplos dignitas,...

Netflix’s ‘Gears of War’ movie gets ‘Doctor Strange’ writer Jon Spaihts

Netflix announced today that the live-action "Gears of War" movie will be written by Jon Spaihts, known for his work on "Doctor Strange" and...
Shreya Christinahttps://londonbusinessblog.com
Shreya has been with londonbusinessblog.com for 3 years, writing copy for client websites, blog posts, EDMs and other mediums to engage readers and encourage action. By collaborating with clients, our SEO manager and the wider londonbusinessblog.com team, Shreya seeks to understand an audience before creating memorable, persuasive copy.

when tilting Roe v. Wadethe US Supreme Court ruling in the Dobb’s case not only deprives women of reproductive control and physical power as a matter of constitutional law, but it also changes their relationship with the online world. Anyone in a state where abortion is now illegal and who relies on the Internet for information, products and services related to reproductive health is subject to online police surveillance.

All women of childbearing age, no matter how safe and privileged they may have imagined being, are now among the the marginalized and vulnerable populations whose privacy is at risk

As a researcher who studies online privacyI know how for a while googlesocial mediaand internet data can generally be used for: oversight by law enforcement to cast digital trawls. Women are not only at risk because of what they reveal about their reproductive status on social media, but also because of their data health applicationswho could charge them if they were subpoenaed.

Who is being tracked and how?

Thanks for your participation!

View the highlights of TNW Conference 2022 →

People most vulnerable to online privacy breaches and to the use or misuse of their data have traditionally been those who deserve less protection from society: people without resources, power, or social status† Surveillance targeting marginalized people reflects not only a lack of interest in protecting them, but also a suspicion that their social identities make them more likely to commit crimes or transgress in ways that justify preventive police work

Many marginalized people happen to be women, including: low-income mothers, for whom the mere act of applying for government aid may subject them to suspicions of criminal intent. These presumptions are often used to justify: invasion of their privacy† Now, with anti-abortion laws that Republican-controlled states and ready to go into effect with the Roe v. Wade ending, all women of childbearing age in those states will likely be subject to the same presumptions.

In the past, women only had to worry about that Target whether Amazon could learn from their pregnancies. Based on what is already known about privacy violations by law enforcement against marginalized peopleis it likely that in the post-Roe world women will be more in the crosshairs of digital forensics† For example, law enforcement agencies routinely use: forensic tools to search people’s cell phones when investigating a wide variety of crimes, sometimes without a search warrant.

Credit: AP Photo/Brian Melley